And here is Ankhesenamun again - I painted her hands, feet and the basic form of the dress. Will have to add details once the paint has dried. I think the ancient artists did a great job at showing the sheer transparent linen dress and I hope my painting shows the same effect.
Sunday, January 9, 2011
Thursday, January 6, 2011
Saturday, December 11, 2010
Tutankhamo's belt and kilt
I worked on the belt and the kilt of the pharaoh today. I'll leave the sash to another day - it is full of tiny precious stones and will be quite a job to paint. Next I think I'll start on Ankhesenamun so that Tut will have time to dry. Wouldn't want to smudge my work by accident if I now tried to paint the sash...
Monday, December 6, 2010
Tut's collar and torso
Here I first painted the collar...
And today I painted his hands and torso and feet. He is shown as a handsome young man, even though we know today that he suffered from illnesses. But the ancient Egyptians could not show their pharaoh as anything else but ideal - anything else would have been against "maat" or balance, if you will. Just like Hatshepsut depicted herself as a man, when she took the crown of pharaoh, Tut was depicted as perfect despite his health problems. Appearance was everything with the ruler.
But then again, think how Tut's father, Akhenaten was depicted. His female form and elongated face, heavy lips and slanted eyes must have been a horror to the traditional Egyptians. So in case of his son (and daughter, as Ankhesenamun here is Tut's half sister) traditional art was the way to show them to the world.
Normal Egyptians did not prefer sibling marriages, but the royal family found this to be a way to keep the crown within the family. They had no wish to extend their small elite group or unite with other families. So the Great Royal Wives were more often than not from within their own small family. The lesser wives could be outside the immediate families - their sons became pharaoh usually only if the Great Royal Wife (or queen as we say it, even though they had no such word) did not give birth to a son or if her sons died before their father the pharaoh. And even then the lesser wives did not rule the country if their sons were still children - no, if it was necessary, it was the Great Royal Wife who ruled the land for the child-pharaoh until he became of age to take the crown. The mother of the new king got the title "Kings Mother" and was respected for it.
It seems Tutankhamon was the the son of Akhenaten and his full sister, according to the latest DNA research. So it seems Nefertiti did not give birth to a son, or if she did, he died in infancy (boys were not usually shown with the pharaoh in art, but daughters often were, so we don't know if Nefertiti had a son). But Nefertiti was the Great Royal Wife and probably took over the upbringing of the small Tutankhaten and after Ekhnaton's death had a role in making him pharaoh.
And today I painted his hands and torso and feet. He is shown as a handsome young man, even though we know today that he suffered from illnesses. But the ancient Egyptians could not show their pharaoh as anything else but ideal - anything else would have been against "maat" or balance, if you will. Just like Hatshepsut depicted herself as a man, when she took the crown of pharaoh, Tut was depicted as perfect despite his health problems. Appearance was everything with the ruler.
But then again, think how Tut's father, Akhenaten was depicted. His female form and elongated face, heavy lips and slanted eyes must have been a horror to the traditional Egyptians. So in case of his son (and daughter, as Ankhesenamun here is Tut's half sister) traditional art was the way to show them to the world.
Normal Egyptians did not prefer sibling marriages, but the royal family found this to be a way to keep the crown within the family. They had no wish to extend their small elite group or unite with other families. So the Great Royal Wives were more often than not from within their own small family. The lesser wives could be outside the immediate families - their sons became pharaoh usually only if the Great Royal Wife (or queen as we say it, even though they had no such word) did not give birth to a son or if her sons died before their father the pharaoh. And even then the lesser wives did not rule the country if their sons were still children - no, if it was necessary, it was the Great Royal Wife who ruled the land for the child-pharaoh until he became of age to take the crown. The mother of the new king got the title "Kings Mother" and was respected for it.
It seems Tutankhamon was the the son of Akhenaten and his full sister, according to the latest DNA research. So it seems Nefertiti did not give birth to a son, or if she did, he died in infancy (boys were not usually shown with the pharaoh in art, but daughters often were, so we don't know if Nefertiti had a son). But Nefertiti was the Great Royal Wife and probably took over the upbringing of the small Tutankhaten and after Ekhnaton's death had a role in making him pharaoh.
Sunday, November 28, 2010
Tut's crown and head
Took me seven hours to work the underpainting of the crown and the head. Obviously not all done - when I work with color I'll be putting the details in place.
Here is the whole painting so far...
And here is the pharaoh's head. The reference photo I am using here shows the face rather "flat" but I digged out ever photo and book showing this throne that I have, and made the face more lifelike.
Here is the whole painting so far...
And here is the pharaoh's head. The reference photo I am using here shows the face rather "flat" but I digged out ever photo and book showing this throne that I have, and made the face more lifelike.
Sunday, November 14, 2010
Tut's Throne - background all blocked
Now I have blocked the background - but it will not stay this smooth in the finished painting. Years have crumbled the gold foil of the chair and it is quite wrinkled.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)









